doing theology

John Meyendorff says:

The church, as eucharistic community, existed before the New Testament books were written, and these books were themselves composed in and for concrete local churches. Their written text is meant to be read and understood by baptized, committed people gathered in the name of the Lord. Theology, therefore, is not simply a science, using Scripture as initial data; it also presupposes living in communion with God and people, in Christ and the Spirit, within the community of the church.

How I Would Run for President.

Once in awhile I think of how it would be to run a campaign for President that is truly different from the garbage we have to put up with every four years. Do the hacks who run these campaigns really suffer from a complete lack of imagination? For one thing, if I was the candidate, I would try to be unflinchingly honest. Instead of the trite “this is the most important election in a generation” balderdash that we hear (every four years is a fork in the road, the most important blah blah blah) I’d say: “This is not the most important election in a generation. It’s just another election. Assuming I win, I’ll be gone in four to eight years. There’s not much of lasting worth that I can accomplish in that amount of time. I’ll try not to send us in the wrong direction and not to do any lasting damage to what I have inherited.”

I’d cap spending where it is the day I take office and promise that it will not increase one penny while I am in. And I’d fight like everything to keep that promise, no matter what slice of the bloated pie would be cut to keep it there. That way, there would be not cutbacks, or increases, just the status quo. Surely we could agree that spending the same 4 trillion a year or whatever will suffice for 4 years? I’d shutdown every single base overseas and relinquish our role as the Earth Force. Yes, this would produce massive geopolitical upheaval, but oh well.

I wouldn’t run cheesy ads with flags and workers in pristine factories with hardhats on and all that junk. I’d just have a white background and pay someone who does dishwasher detergent ads for daytime TV to make some snappy jingle and then I’d pop up from the right side of the screen and joke around. I’d say, “I’m not going to give you some nonsensical promises about how everything will be better and how we need to fight for American values. I’m running to be in power, not due to some great cause. I’d like to do a few things and not do many others. If you don’t like me, vote for _____.” We’d run off the wall ads that were nothing like the typical pablum we tune out all the time.

I wouldn’t run around making stump speeches that no one cared about. I’d just sit in a studio and talk to people, or have them call in, something of that nature. Do sort of a Letterman show that while serious, was not pretentious. That would be the campaign. Maybe refuse to go to any states, and cancel the convention. Just mail in the vote and save the nonsense. If I debated I wouldn’t do the canned answer, I’d just try to fire in answers honestly off the top of my head.

I’d keep a blog and write on it all the time. Maybe I’d actually visit small out of the way towns and see what they think about things. I’d encourage leading intellectuals to send me their innovative ideas on how to restructure things, kind of kick ideas around and see what makes sense. My foreign policy would be based on Africa, where I would support Christian nations with massive aid, and encourage Bible publishers to flood the continent with local translations. I wouldn’t spend two pennies on any European nation, they don’t need our help. A few thoughts on how a new kind of campaign could work. I really think there needs to be a breakthrough in how the whole thing works. It is a farce that lies about intentions, reality, and results. The only person I can think of who has been slightly interesting in recent history was the Jerry Brown campaign of 1980. That was a scream. He was kind of honest like that, just a little too Zen for my taste. But I’m sure nothing like this will ever happen, we are doomed to the same grim litany of controlled drivel that has been the norm for quite awhile.

Baptist Catholics

From this article:

The time for remedy is now, for free-church Protestants stand at grave risk of bondage to the spirit of the modern age. Christians of the sort described herein, and Baptists such as I am, seem to face a limited range of options. Amidst the changing cultural conditions precipitated by modernity and now postmodernity, we may: (a) allow our practice of faith — untethered to a rich tradition and without the resources of a functional magisterium — to die the death of continued accommodation to culture; (b) convert to Roman Catholicism; or (c) begin a journey toward Rome that, without giving rise to full communion, nonetheless involves a critical engagement with Roman Catholicism as a touchstone of vital tradition and teaching authority about Christian faith and practice.

Gaffin sounding like Wright

The organic inseparability of the future, bodily resurrection of believers from the realized aspet of being raised with Christ appears to involved the important structural implication that for Paul the justification, adoption, sanctification, and glorification of the believer are future as well as present. This implication cannot be explored here except to point to some of the evidence for the future aspect of justification (Gal. 5:5) and adoption (Rom. 8:23) as well as sanctification-glorification (Phil. 3:21), and to observe that this no more compromises the definitiveness and irreversibility of the justification (and so forth) already realized than future resurrection compromises the definitiveness and irreversibility of resurrection with Christ already experienced.

Gaffin, Resurrection & Redemption, 133-34.

4 questions

I’m sure I’ve blogged this before, but here it goes again. Note from Wright’s NT&TPOG:

4 things worldviews do:
1. Provide stories through which human beings view reality. “Narrative is the most characteristic expression of worldview, going deeper than the isolated observation or fragmented remark.”
2. From these stories one can in principle discover how to answer the basic questions that determine human existence: who are we? Why are we here? What is wrong? What is the solution? All cultures have a sense of identity, of environment, of a problem with the way the world is, and of a way forward – a redemption eschatology, to be more precise – which will, or may, lead out of that problem.
3. These stories are expressed in cultural symbols, festivals, family gatherings, etc. Such symbols often function as social/cultural boundary markers: those who observe them are insiders, those who do not are outsiders.
4. Praxis. Action. The actions people take reflect their answers to the questions.

How does America answer these questions?

The 2 Towers

Tonight I watched video of the WTC towers being hit, mainly different angles of the second hit. I watched it quite a few times. It was eerie, especially one fixed shot of the first tower burning and then the second plane smashing into it. It reminded me of the Matrix. Sirens wail endlessly, then the plane appears from the left and immolates itself. The noise follows, that of a subsonic jet in a narrow corridor, followed by a strange impact sound, an explosion, and glass shattering. You can see the reflection of the fireball in the adjacent building. It is still hard to believe and probably always will be. One second hundreds of people were alive, the next they were dead.

Every once in awhile I watch this stuff to try and prevent forgetting. Not in some jingoistic way – I think God judged America that day and continues to do so. I’m not rah rah about this country. But the sheer awesomeness of the events, the brutal reality of massive planes flying into massive buildings – I don’t think I will ever really absorb it. It is a hyper-real event, a symbol that means everything and nothing. It is also a brutal reality of slit throats and dead kids, of waking up for the rest of your life missing a loved one, and of a brief moment of American humility and vulnerability, when we all realized we were not invincible. It means something different to just about everyone I imagine.

Then I read of how some of the hijackers lived in Vienna, Virginia for awhile. How a couple of them met an illegal immigrant from El Salvador in the parking lot of a 7-11 in Falls Church to get phony IDs. It was all so easy, in a way. And 5 years on we have an open border and apparently speaking against it makes you xenophobic. So come one, come all, just show up and do whatever you want, we don’t seem to care here.

It’s all so insane and bizarre that I’m sure future historians will have a field day writing about this first decade of the century when everyone has forgotten it (probably by the 2020s). None of the people in office now will be around then, we’ll have all new faces. Do you spend your days thinking about Bull Run or the Flanders field? Frozen Chosin? Tet? The memories fade so fast, we all worship youth. This whole squabble is going to be a footnote before we know it. Face this fact: you will die and no one will remember you. No one but God, to whom you return, and whose memory is perfect. Number your days, choose wisely.

Responsorium 9

Sepulto Domino, signatum est
monumentum, volventes lapidem ad ostium monumenti:
Ponentes milites, qui custodirent illum.
Accedentes principes sacerdotum ad
Pilatum, petierunt illum.
Ponentes milites, qui custodirent illum.
Sepulto Domino, signatum est monumentum, volventes lapidem ad ostium monumenti:
Ponentes milites, qui custodirent illum.

get ready for $5 gas and a regional war

It all seems like a repeat of the nonsense leading up to Iraq, and no one seems able to stop it:

If the order were to be given for an attack, the American combat troops now operating in Iran would be in position to mark the critical targets with laser beams, to insure bombing accuracy and to minimize civilian casualties. As of early winter, I was told by the government consultant with close ties to civilians in the Pentagon, the units were also working with minority groups in Iran, including the Azeris, in the north, the Baluchis, in the southeast, and the Kurds, in the northeast. The troops “are studying the terrain, and giving away walking-around money to ethnic tribes, and recruiting scouts from local tribes and shepherds,” the consultant said. One goal is to get “eyes on the ground”—quoting a line from “Othello,” he said, “Give me the ocular proof.” The broader aim, the consultant said, is to “encourage ethnic tensions” and undermine the regime.

{…}
Iran, which now produces nearly four million barrels of oil a day, would not have to cut off production to disrupt the world’s oil markets. It could blockade or mine the Strait of Hormuz, the thirty-four-mile-wide passage through which Middle Eastern oil reaches the Indian Ocean. Nonetheless, the recently retired defense official dismissed the strategic consequences of such actions. He told me that the U.S. Navy could keep shipping open by conducting salvage missions and putting mine- sweepers to work. “It’s impossible to block passage,” he said. The government consultant with ties to the Pentagon also said he believed that the oil problem could be managed, pointing out that the U.S. has enough in its strategic reserves to keep America running for sixty days. However, those in the oil business I spoke to were less optimistic; one industry expert estimated that the price per barrel would immediately spike, to anywhere from ninety to a hundred dollars per barrel, and could go higher, depending on the duration and scope of the conflict.